Cursor.directory vs Docker MCP Catalog
A direct comparison of pricing, capabilities and fit. We state where each one is genuinely stronger rather than pretending they are interchangeable.
| Criterion | Cursor.directory | Docker MCP Catalog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | MCP Servers | MCP Servers |
| Pricing model | Free to submit | Free; acceptance via pull request |
| Entry price | Not published | Not published |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| API available | No | No |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Rating | No reviews | No reviews |
Cursor.directory
Community marketplace for Cursor, recommended by Cursor itself.
Full review → Visit siteDocker MCP Catalog
Official catalog of MCP servers that run in Docker Desktop.
Full review → Visit siteFrequently asked questions
Which is better, Cursor.directory or Docker MCP Catalog?
It depends on your constraints. Cursor.directory is available with a free tier and has no public API. Docker MCP Catalog is available with a free tier and has no public API.
How much does Cursor.directory cost compared to Docker MCP Catalog?
Cursor.directory: Free to submit. Docker MCP Catalog: Free; acceptance via pull request.
Can I use Cursor.directory and Docker MCP Catalog together?
Yes. Both expose limited integration options, so they can be combined in a workflow where one handles a different stage of the process.